58 research outputs found

    Opportunistic Interference Mitigation Achieves Optimal Degrees-of-Freedom in Wireless Multi-cell Uplink Networks

    Full text link
    We introduce an opportunistic interference mitigation (OIM) protocol, where a user scheduling strategy is utilized in KK-cell uplink networks with time-invariant channel coefficients and base stations (BSs) having MM antennas. Each BS opportunistically selects a set of users who generate the minimum interference to the other BSs. Two OIM protocols are shown according to the number SS of simultaneously transmitting users per cell: opportunistic interference nulling (OIN) and opportunistic interference alignment (OIA). Then, their performance is analyzed in terms of degrees-of-freedom (DoFs). As our main result, it is shown that KMKM DoFs are achievable under the OIN protocol with MM selected users per cell, if the total number NN of users in a cell scales at least as SNR(K1)M\text{SNR}^{(K-1)M}. Similarly, it turns out that the OIA scheme with SS(<M<M) selected users achieves KSKS DoFs, if NN scales faster than SNR(K1)S\text{SNR}^{(K-1)S}. These results indicate that there exists a trade-off between the achievable DoFs and the minimum required NN. By deriving the corresponding upper bound on the DoFs, it is shown that the OIN scheme is DoF optimal. Finally, numerical evaluation, a two-step scheduling method, and the extension to multi-carrier scenarios are shown.Comment: 18 pages, 3 figures, Submitted to IEEE Transactions on Communication

    Can One Achieve Multiuser Diversity in Uplink Multi-Cell Networks?

    Full text link
    We introduce a distributed opportunistic scheduling (DOS) strategy, based on two pre-determined thresholds, for uplink KK-cell networks with time-invariant channel coefficients. Each base station (BS) opportunistically selects a mobile station (MS) who has a large signal strength of the desired channel link among a set of MSs generating a sufficiently small interference to other BSs. Then, performance on the achievable throughput scaling law is analyzed. As our main result, it is shown that the achievable sum-rate scales as Klog(SNRlogN)K\log(\text{SNR}\log N) in a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) regime, if the total number of users in a cell, NN, scales faster than SNRK11ϵ\text{SNR}^{\frac{K-1}{1-\epsilon}} for a constant ϵ(0,1)\epsilon\in(0,1). This result indicates that the proposed scheme achieves the multiuser diversity gain as well as the degrees-of-freedom gain even under multi-cell environments. Simulation results show that the DOS provides a better sum-rate throughput over conventional schemes.Comment: 11 pages, 3 figures, 2 tables, to appear in IEEE Transactions on Communication

    Learning Disentangled Representation for Fair Facial Attribute Classification via Fairness-aware Information Alignment

    No full text
    Although AI systems archive a great success in various societal fields, there still exists a challengeable issue of outputting discriminatory results with respect to protected attributes (e.g., gender and age). The popular approach to solving the issue is to remove protected attribute information in the decision process. However, this approach has a limitation that beneficial information for target tasks may also be eliminated. To overcome the limitation, we propose Fairness-aware Disentangling Variational Auto-Encoder (FD-VAE) that disentangles data representation into three subspaces: 1) Target Attribute Latent (TAL), 2) Protected Attribute Latent (PAL), 3) Mutual Attribute Latent (MAL). On top of that, we propose a decorrelation loss that aligns the overall information into each subspace, instead of removing the protected attribute information. After learning the representation, we re-encode MAL to include only target information and combine it with TAL to perform downstream tasks. In our experiments on CelebA and UTK Face datasets, we show that the proposed method mitigates unfairness in facial attribute classification tasks with respect to gender and age. Ours outperforms previous methods by large margins on two standard fairness metrics, equal opportunity and equalized odds
    corecore